Monkey stamp
This ceramic stamp features the image of a monkey in profile with its arms splayed to either side of its head. The parallel lines radiating out from the monkey’s crown resemble the shock of unkempt hair of the Mexican spider monkey. Its upright stance and flexed knees create a sense of movement in the figure—as if it were walking—while its rotund, helical belly is a playful element of abstraction. As the German archaeologist Eduard Seler long ago noted, in ancient Mexico, the spider monkey was connected with the themes of music, dance, and clowning.
In Nahuatl, the monkey is called ozomatli and is the eleventh day sign of the ancient Aztec calendar. Unlike our calendar today, which consists of twelve months of approximately thirty days each, the Aztecs and other Mesoamerican peoples used "months" of just twenty days. Each day was given a number and named after a different animal or other natural element—for example, "1 Crocodile," "2 Reed," or "4 Movement (Earthquake)."
Monkeys were closely associated with the wind deity Ehecatl, whose teardrop-shaped earrings (epcololli) and split-conch necklaces are often depicted in sculpted images of primates. Almost invariably, artists in the Postclassic period (ca. 900–1521) showed monkeys with large stomachs, animated facial expressions, and attenuated tails that they often hold in their paws.
Ceramic stamps were made in Central Mexico from the Early Formative period (ca. 1800–1200 B.C.) and continued into the early sixteenth century. It is assumed that the earliest examples of such objects functioned much as they did among the Aztecs three millennia later: as ornamental devices used to decorate clothing, ceramic vessels, and even the body. They typically feature abstract geometric designs or stylized animal imagery, often in repeating patterns. Commonly found interred with human remains, these stamps were apparently valued as highly in death as they were in life.
William T. Gassaway, 2014-15 Sylvan C. Coleman and Pamela Coleman Fellow
-----
Resources and Additional Reading
Bierhorst, John. History and Mythology of the Aztecs: The Codex Chimalpopoca. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1992.
Miller, Mary E., and Karl Taube. The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya: An Illustrated Dictionary of Mesoamerican Religion. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd, 1993.
Sahagún, Bernardino de. The Florentine Codex: A General History of the Things of New Spain. 12 vols. Translated and edited by Arthur J. O. Anderson and Charles E. Dibble. Santa Fe: School of American Research, 1950–82. For creation myth, see Bk. 11 ("Earthly Things").
Seler, Eduard. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Amerikanischen Sprach- und Altertumskunde. 5 vols. Berlin: Ascher, 1902–23. See esp. Vol. 4, pp. 456–59.
Taube, Karl. Olmec Art at Dumbarton Oaks. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2004.
In Nahuatl, the monkey is called ozomatli and is the eleventh day sign of the ancient Aztec calendar. Unlike our calendar today, which consists of twelve months of approximately thirty days each, the Aztecs and other Mesoamerican peoples used "months" of just twenty days. Each day was given a number and named after a different animal or other natural element—for example, "1 Crocodile," "2 Reed," or "4 Movement (Earthquake)."
Monkeys were closely associated with the wind deity Ehecatl, whose teardrop-shaped earrings (epcololli) and split-conch necklaces are often depicted in sculpted images of primates. Almost invariably, artists in the Postclassic period (ca. 900–1521) showed monkeys with large stomachs, animated facial expressions, and attenuated tails that they often hold in their paws.
Ceramic stamps were made in Central Mexico from the Early Formative period (ca. 1800–1200 B.C.) and continued into the early sixteenth century. It is assumed that the earliest examples of such objects functioned much as they did among the Aztecs three millennia later: as ornamental devices used to decorate clothing, ceramic vessels, and even the body. They typically feature abstract geometric designs or stylized animal imagery, often in repeating patterns. Commonly found interred with human remains, these stamps were apparently valued as highly in death as they were in life.
William T. Gassaway, 2014-15 Sylvan C. Coleman and Pamela Coleman Fellow
-----
Resources and Additional Reading
Bierhorst, John. History and Mythology of the Aztecs: The Codex Chimalpopoca. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1992.
Miller, Mary E., and Karl Taube. The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya: An Illustrated Dictionary of Mesoamerican Religion. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd, 1993.
Sahagún, Bernardino de. The Florentine Codex: A General History of the Things of New Spain. 12 vols. Translated and edited by Arthur J. O. Anderson and Charles E. Dibble. Santa Fe: School of American Research, 1950–82. For creation myth, see Bk. 11 ("Earthly Things").
Seler, Eduard. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Amerikanischen Sprach- und Altertumskunde. 5 vols. Berlin: Ascher, 1902–23. See esp. Vol. 4, pp. 456–59.
Taube, Karl. Olmec Art at Dumbarton Oaks. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2004.
Artwork Details
- Title: Monkey stamp
- Date: 13th–16th century
- Geography: Mexico, Mesoamerica
- Culture: Mexica (Aztec)
- Medium: Ceramic
- Classification: Ceramics-Implements
- Credit Line: Museum Purchase, 1900
- Object Number: 00.5.1165
- Curatorial Department: The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing
More Artwork
A slider containing 5 items.
Press the down key to skip to the last item.
Press the down key to skip to the last item.
Eastern Nahua artist(s)
1200–1521 CE
Nayarit
200 BCE–200 CE
Las Bocas artist(s)
1200–800 BCE
Ameca-Etzatlán artists
200 BCE–300 CE
South central Veracruz artist(s)
600–1000 CE
Research Resources
The Met provides unparalleled resources for research and welcomes an international community of students and scholars. The Met's Open Access API is where creators and researchers can connect to the The Met collection. Open Access data and public domain images are available for unrestricted commercial and noncommercial use without permission or fee.
To request images under copyright and other restrictions, please use this Image Request form.
Feedback
We continue to research and examine historical and cultural context for objects in The Met collection. If you have comments or questions about this object record, please complete and submit this form. The Museum looks forward to receiving your comments.