Carthage, located along the African coast of the Mediterranean, was one of the ancient world’s largest and most powerful capitals until its destruction by the Romans in 146 BCE. As suggested here, the carnage was unspeakable, and the city burned for seventeen days. Through daring foreshortening—note the fallen figure and the man tipping his standard away from us—Tiepolo gave his composition a tense dynamism that fits the subject. For viewers in the 1700s, this event probably alluded to more recent battles between the Republic of Venice and the Ottoman Empire. Members of the Delfin family, who commissioned this painting as one in a series showing ancient Roman victories, played an important part in those campaigns.
Due to rights restrictions, this image cannot be enlarged, viewed at full screen, or downloaded.
Open Access
As part of the Met's Open Access policy, you can freely copy, modify and distribute this image, even for commercial purposes.
API
Public domain data for this object can also be accessed using the Met's Open Access API.
Dimensions:Irregular painted surface, 162 x 148 3/8 in. (411.5 x 376.9 cm)
Classification:Paintings
Credit Line:Rogers Fund, 1965
Accession Number:65.183.2
This work is usually identified as depicting the bloody capture of Carthage by Publius Cornelius Scipio, an event that took place in 146 B.C. It is from a series of ten monumental canvases of scenes from Roman history that Tiepolo painted for the grand reception room of the Palazzo Dolfin in Venice. Dating from about 1726–29, the works remained in situ until 1872. In addition to the three in The Met (65.183.1, 65.183.2, 65.183.3), five are in the Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg, and two in the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna.
The illusionistic architectural framework surrounding the recesses into which the paintings were set dictated the irregular profiles of the canvases, altered when they were removed from the palace in 1872 and restored in the cases of those now in Vienna and New York. The recesses still survive, making a definitive reconstruction of the arrangement of the cycle possible. To either side of the main doorway were the two squarish battle scenes, this work and The Battle of Vercellae, also in The Met, while opposite them to either side of the center window were the two narrow canvases depicting The Death of Lucius Junius Brutus and Hannibal Contemplating the Head of Hasdrubal, both in Vienna. A sort of triptych appeared on each of the two shorter walls, with the Museum's Triumph of Marius flanked by Fabius Maximus before the Roman Senate and Cincinnatus Offered the Dictatorship, both in the Hermitage, and, opposite, The Tarantine Triumph flanked by Mucius Scaevola before Porsenna and Veturia Pleading with Coriolanus, all in the Hermitage. All the canvases except the two battle scenes were originally provided with banderoles identifying the subjects from Lucius Annaeus Florus's Epitomae de Tito Livio belorum . . . Libri II. (All the banderoles were painted over in the nineteenth century, but some have been uncovered in restoration.)
What makes these pictures so compelling as works of art is the manner in which Roman history is treated as staged theater rather than archaeological fact. To a degree, this approach was typically Venetian, but Tiepolo stands apart from his contemporaries in his insistence on narrative clarity and dramatic focus: at no point does he sacrifice intensity of expression to decorative concerns.
The Tarantine Triumph must be the earliest painting in the series, followed by that work's two flanking canvases, and then the remaining compositions, including the two battle scenes. The Triumph of Marius is unquestionably the latest picture in the cycle, which is why it is dated and why Tiepolo included his portrait in it.
[2010; adapted from Christiansen 1996]
Inscription: Inscribed (left, on standard): SPQR
Ca' Dolfin, Venice (until 1872); Daniele III (Giovanni) and Daniele IV (Gerolamo) Dolfin, Ca' Dolfin (until both d. 1729); Dolfin family, Ca' Dolfin (1729–98); Cecilia Dolfin Lippomano, Ca' Dolfin (from 1798); by descent to Gasparo Lippomano, Ca' Dolfin (until d. 1854); his nephew, conte Giovanni Querini Stampalia, Ca' Dolfin (1854–d. 1868); [Michelangelo Guggenheim, Venice, by 1870–72; sold for 50,000 lire to von Aichholz]; Baron Eugen Miller von Aichholz, Palast Aichholz, Vienna (1872–d. 1919; his sale, Hôtel Drouot, Paris, April 15, 1876, no. 2, as "Assaut et prise de Palmyre," 480 x 370 cm, bought in); Camillo Castiglioni, Palast Aichholz, Vienna (1919–35; pledged as collateral security for a loan in 1932; transferred to Mendl in 1935); Dr. Stefan Mendl, Zürich, later New York and Saranac Lake, N.Y. (1935–d. 1955; his estate, 1955–65; sold to The Met)
New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. "Venetian Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum," May 1–September 2, 1974, no catalogue.
New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. "Giambattista Tiepolo, 1696–1770," January 24–April 27, 1997, no. 12f.
Vincenzo da Canal. Vita del sig. Gregorio Lazzarini Pittor Veneziano. 1732 [published as "Vita di Gregorio Lazzarini," Venice: Stamperia Palese, 1809, p. XXXIV], mentions ten paintings of varying heights in the main room of the Ca' Dolfin; does not give the artist's name; states that they depict battles and triumphs of Coriolanus along with other scenes from Roman history.
Daniele Florio. Poetici componimenti per le gloriosissime nozze di S.S.E.E. il Sig. Giovanni Delfino e la Sig. Bianca Contarini. [Venice], [1747], p. 39 [see Ref. Sohm 1986].
Jean Claude Richard, Abbé de Saint-Non. Journal entry. May–June 1761 [published in Pierre Rosenberg and Barbara Brejon de Lavergnée, "Panopticon italiano: un diario di viaggio ritrovato, 1759–1761," Rome, 1986, pp. 202, 206], mentions large frescoes [sic] in a grand salon of the Ca' Dolfin, calling them some of Tiepolo's best works made in Venice.
Pierre Jacques Onésyme Bergeret de Grancourt. Journal entry. July 23, 1774 [published in "Bergeret et Fragonard: Journal inédit d'un voyage en Italie, 1773–1774, précédé d'une étude par M. A. Tornézy," Mémoires de la Société des Antiquaires de l'Ouest 17, ser. 2 (1894), p. 386], admires the ten large paintings by Tiepolo in the Ca' Dolfin, identifying the subjects as episodes from Roman history.
Giannantonio Moschini. Della letteratura veneziana del secolo XVIII fino a' nostri giorni. Vol. 3, Venice, 1806, p. 75, calls Tiepolo's paintings in the Ca' Dolfin early works.
Giovanni Morelli. Letter to Giovanni Melli. February 21, 1872 [see Ref. Christiansen 1998], writes from Venice that "yesterday [Miller] bought ten large Tiepolo canvases from a dealer here for the price of 46,000 francs".
Giovanni Morelli. Letter to Sir Austen Henry Layard. March 5, 1872 [see Ref. Christiansen 1998], writes that the ten paintings by Tiepolo "are truly done with much spirit and brio but in the end are little more than decoration"; notes that the dealer from whom Miller bought the paintings was Michelangelo Guggenheim.
Henry de Chennevières. Les Tiepolo. Paris, [1898?], p. 18, mentions the Ca' Dolfin pictures among Tiepolo's early works.
Heinrich Modern. Giovanni Battista Tiepolo. Vienna, 1902, pp. 22–23, 53, states that the Ca' Dolfin came into the hands of an art dealer about twenty-five years ago, that he sold Tiepolo's paintings, and that Eugen Miller von Aichholz brought them to Vienna; adds that Miller retains five, five having later gone to Russia; calls them early works and notes the influence of Piazzetta.
Pompeo Molmenti. G. B. Tiepolo: la sua vita e le sue opere. Milan, [1909], pp. 276–77, 285 n. 13, ill. between pp. 266 and 267, as "Assedio di Palmira"; states incorrectly that Miller acquired the ten paintings in 1870, and adds that he installed the three works now in the MMA on the staircase of his palace; cites references to the pictures in letters (Museo Correr, Venice) of Luigi Ballarini, Andrea Dolfin's agent, during the period 1780–92.
Eduard Sack. Giambattista und Domenico Tiepolo: Ihr Leben und Ihre Werke. Hamburg, 1910, vol. 1, pp. 33–35, fig. 20; vol. 2, pp. 151, 203, no. 13, dates them about 1720; notes a later drawing by Tiepolo after part of this composition in the Kupferstichkabinett, Stuttgart.
E. de Liphart inLes anciennes écoles de peinture dans les palais et collections privées russes, représentées à l'exposition organisée à St.-Pétersbourg en 1909 par la revue d'art ancien "Staryé gody". Brussels, 1910, p. 38 n. 1, notes that he saw the paintings still in place in 1870, when the Ca' Dolfin was in a state of ruin; mentions that the dealer Guggenheim bought some of the contents for 20,000 lire [implying that this price includes more items than the ten Tiepolo paintings] and sold the Tiepolo pictures to Miller for 50,000 lire.
J. v. Derschau. "Tiepolos Schlachtenbilder in Wiener Privatbesitz." Der Cicerone 7 (1915), pp. 16, 20, pl. 1, as "Sturm auf Palmyra"; dates the series about 1720.
Bortolo Giovanni Dolfin. I Dolfin (Delfino) patrizii veneziani nella storia di Venezia dall'anno 452 al 1923. 2nd ed., rev. and enl. Milan, 1924, p. 187 [see Ref. Christiansen 1996].
Paolo M. Arese. "Il palazzo e la raccolta Castiglioni a Vienna." Illustrazione italiana 52 (March 29, 1925), pp. 259–60, 262, ill. pp. 261 (photograph of three MMA paintings installed on staircase) and 263, as "Guerre giugertine".
Giuseppe Fiocco. Venetian Painting of the Seicento and the Settecento. Florence, [1929], p. 58, dates them about 1725.
Giuseppe Fiocco. "The Castiglioni Tiepolos at Vienna." Burlington Magazine 58 (April 1931), pp. 173–74, pl. IIA, as "The Taking of Carthage".
"Rundschau: Wien, Neuerwerbungen der Galerie." Pantheon 7 (January 1931), p. III.
Wart Arslan. "Studi sulla pittura del primo Settecento veneziano." Critica d'arte 1 (1935–36), p. 250, dates them 1725–26.
Giulio Lorenzetti. "Tre note Tiepolesche." Rivista di Venezia 14 (August 1935), pp. 391–92.
Max Goering. Italienische Malerei des siebzehnten und achtzehnten Jahrhunderts. Berlin, 1936, p. 31, pl. 81, dates them about 1720.
M. I. Shcherbacheva. Tiepolo's Pictures of the Venice Dolfino Palace at the Hermitage Museum. Leningrad [St. Petersburg], 1941, pp. 3–46, pl. 11, finds a date of 1720–25 plausible; discusses the subject matter and notes its connection with the history of the Dolfin family; mentions and illustrates an etching by Saint-Non after a drawing by Fragonard of part of this composition.
Antonio Morassi. "Novità e precisazioni sul Tiepolo—II." Le arti 4 (April–May 1942), pp. 259–64, figs. 3, 12, 13 (overall and details), dates the ten paintings about 1726–30 and discusses their history; notes the alteration in size of some of the canvases and deduces the original positions of the works from the stucco frames still in situ.
Antonio Morassi. Tiepolo. Bergamo, 1943, p. 16, pls. 30, 31 (overall and detail).
Antonio Morassi. G. B. Tiepolo: His Life and Work. London, 1955, pp. 11–12.
Rodolfo Pallucchini. La pittura veneziana del Settecento. Venice, 1960, p. 71, accepts Morassi's [see Ref. 1942] dating of 1726–30.
Antonio Morassi. A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings of G. B. Tiepolo. London, 1962, pp. 15, 34, 66, fig. 306.
Terisio Pignatti. Disegni dei Guardi. Florence, 1967, unpaginated, under no. XXIXv, publishes a drawing (Museo Horne, Florence) by Francesco Guardi after the group of soldiers at the right of this painting.
Anna Pallucchini inL'opera completa di Giambattista Tiepolo. Milan, 1968, pp. 91–92, no. 48E, ill., dates the series 1725–30.
George Knox and Christel Thiem. Tiepolo: Zeichnungen von Giambattista, Domenico und Lorenzo Tiepolo . . . . Exh. cat., Graphische Sammlung Staatsgalerie Stuttgart. 1970, p. 127, under no. 146, publish a drawing in the Staatsgalerie Stuttgart related to the group at the right of this painting; mention a second drawing (Rudolf J. Heinemann, New York) related to the fallen soldier at center foreground and a third drawing (Robert von Hirsch, Basel) related to a figure in "The Battle of Vercellae"; tentatively ascribe the three drawings to Giovanni Battista and date them about 1750, suggesting that "The Capture of Carthage" and "The Battle of Vercellae" might therefore have been painted much later than the other canvases in the series.
Aldo Rizzi. Mostra del Tiepolo. Exh. cat., Villa Manin di Passariano. Vol. [1], "Dipinti."[Milan], [1971], fig. 13.
Jean Cailleux. "Tiepolo et Boucher." Celebrazioni tiepolesche: atti del Congresso internazionale di studi sul Tiepolo con un'appendice sulla mostra. Ed. Elettra Quargnal. [Milan], [1971], pp. 96, 100 n. 29, fig. 2 (cropped), dates the series probably about 1728–30, mentioning the date of 1729 appearing on "The Triumph of Marius"; discusses the alterations in the sizes of the canvases.
Burton B. Fredericksen and Federico Zeri. Census of Pre-Nineteenth-Century Italian Paintings in North American Public Collections. Cambridge, Mass., 1972, pp. 197, 480, 609.
Federico Zeri with the assistance of Elizabeth E. Gardner. Italian Paintings: A Catalogue of the Collection of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Venetian School. New York, 1973, pp. 60–63, pl. 66, believe that the painting more probably depicts events from the life of the fifth-century-B.C. Roman hero Gaius Marcius Coriolanus than the capture of Carthage in 146 B.C. by Publius Cornelius Scipio Emilianus.
Felice Stampfle and Cara D. Denison. Drawings from the Collection of Lore and Rudolf Heinemann. New York, 1973, pp. 51–52, under no. 82, attribute the Stuttgart, Heinemann, and Hirsch drawings to Giovanni Domenico.
Antonio Porcella. La giovinezza di Giambattista Tiepolo. Rome, 1973, pp. 39–42, 50 n. 59, pp. 55–56, fig. 53, dates the series 1725–30.
Anthony M. Clark inThe Metropolitan Museum of Art: Notable Acquisitions, 1965–1975. New York, 1975, p. 84, ill.
George Knox. "Some Notes on Large Paintings Depicting Scenes from Antique History by Ricci, Piazzetta, Bambini & Tiepolo." Atti del Congresso internazionale di studi su Sebastiano Ricci e il suo tempo. Ed. Anna Serra. [Milan], [1976?], p. 103.
Giuliana Pradella. "La decorazione pittorica di Ca' Dolfin." Master's thesis, Università degli Studi di Venezia, 1979–80, pp. 1–112, identifies Daniele IV Dolfin as the family member who commissioned the series of paintings from Tiepolo.
Arnauld Brejon de Lavergnée. Dijon, Musée Magnin: Catalogue des tableaux et dessins italiens (XVe–XIXe siècles). Paris, 1980, p. 109.
George Knox. Giambattista and Domenico Tiepolo: A Study and Catalogue Raisonné of the Chalk Drawings. Oxford, 1980, vol. 1, pp. 60–66 n. 5, develops his argument [see Ref Knox and Thiem 1970] that "The Capture of Carthage" and "The Battle of Vercellae" were painted some time after the rest of the series, dating them about 1754, based on his dating of the Stuttgart, Heinemann, and Hirsch drawings, which he attributes to Giovanni Battista; discusses the subject matter, suggesting that this picture "actually represents the fall of the city of Corioli, at which Coriolanus won his name".
Egidio Martini. La pittura del Settecento veneto. Udine, 1982, p. 55.
Michael Levey. Giambattista Tiepolo: His Life and Art. New Haven, 1986, pp. 52–53, dates the entire series about 1729 and suggests that Tiepolo may have worked on the pictures during the winter months of the years in which he spent the summers working at Udine; notes the influence of Solimena.
Philip L. Sohm. "A New Document on Giambattista Tiepolo's Santa Fosca Residence." Arte veneta 40 (1986).
Alvise Zorzi. Venetian Palaces. New York, 1990, pp. 479–80.
George Knox. "Tiepolo Triumphant: The Roman History Cycles of Ca' Dolfin, Venice." Apollo 134 (November 1991), pp. 301–2, 305, 309, colorpl. II, suggests that "The Battle of Vercellae" and "The Capture of Carthage" actually depict, respectively, the battle against the Volsci and the fall of Corioli, following the text of Ref. Canal 1732, where the series is described as "le battaglie e i trionfi di Coriolano"; confirms his dating of these two pictures to about 1754 [although Canal's description precedes this date by twenty-two years].
Massimo Gemin and Filippo Pedrocco. Giambattista Tiepolo: i dipinti, opera completa. Venice, 1993, pp. 60–63, 258–59, no. 88, ill., date the entire series 1726–29.
Beverly Louise Brown. Giambattista Tiepolo: Master of the Oil Sketch. Exh. cat., Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth. Milan, 1993, pp. 157–60.
Rodolfo Pallucchini. La pittura nel Veneto: il Settecento. Vol. 1, Milan, 1995, pp. 348, 352–53, fig. 572.
Michael Kimmelman. "The Tiepolos Bloom Again in Face Lift at the Met." New York Times (September 8, 1995), p. C24.
Katharine Baetjer. European Paintings in The Metropolitan Museum of Art by Artists Born Before 1865: A Summary Catalogue. New York, 1995, p. 87, ill.
Diane De Grazia inItalian Paintings of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Washington, 1996, pp. 312, 314, 316 nn. 26, 33, 35.
Keith Christiansen et al. inGiambattista Tiepolo, 1696–1770. Ed. Keith Christiansen. Exh. cat., The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 1996, pp. 12, 30, 36, 44, 49, 57, 60, 63, 79, 81, 84, 86, 94–95, 97, 99–103, 109, no. 12f, ill. (color, overall and details) [Italian ed., "Giambattista Tiepolo, 1696–1996," Milan], dates it about 1728–29; believes that although it is impossible to know for sure, the scene probably is meant to depict the capture of Carthage.
Beverly Louise Brown. "Giambattista Tiepolo at the Metropolitan." Apollo 145 (April 1997), p. 58.
Valentina Conticelli. "Ca' Dolfin a San Pantalon: precisazioni sulla committenza e sul programma iconografico della 'Magnifica Sala'." Giambattista Tiepolo nel terzo centenario della nascita. Ed. Lionello Puppi. Padua, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 231–32, 234–36, believes the patron was Daniele Dolfin III (Giovanni) and not Daniele IV (Girolamo), on the basis of the former's previously unpublished testament; discusses parallels between the Dolfin commissions for Udine and Venice; identifies a link between this painting and the allegorical figure of Immortality in the ceiling, suggesting the presence of a single iconographic program that informs the entire decoration of the salone, exalting civic, moral, and heroic virtues.
Monica Centanni. "Guerra e morte fraterna: il mito storico romano nelle tele di Giovambattista Tiepolo per i Dolfin." Giambattista Tiepolo nel terzo centenario della nascita. Ed. Lionello Puppi. Padua, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 267, 270–71; vol. 2, p. 100, fig. 6 (detail), p. 101, fig. 7, proposes a new allegorical reading of the Dolfin cycle, on the basis of a re-examination of Florus and Livy, identifying this painting as "Furius Camillus halts the invasion of Rome at the hands of Brennus' Gauls"; believes the Roman victories are primarily exempla virtutis.
Keith Christiansen. "The Ca' Dolfin Tiepolos." Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 55 (Spring 1998), pp. 9–60, ill. on back cover and inside front and back covers, figs. 6 , 8, 24, 26, 45, 47, 48, 59, 61, 63 (color and black and white, and color details).
Collecting Connoisseurship and the Art Market in Risorgimento Italy: Giovanni Morelli's Letters to Giovanni Melli and Pietro Zavaritt (1866–1872). Ed. Jaynie Anderson. Venice, 1999, pp. 151–52 n. 143.
Valentina Conticelli. "Il ciclo pittorico di Ca' Dolfin: Tiepolo, Mantegna e l'antico." Proporzioni, n.s., 1 (2000), pp. 181, 194 n. 10, p. 196 n. 25.
Valentina Conticelli. "Eroi, battaglie e trionfi: fonti classiche per un ciclo di Tiepolo." Fontes: rivista di filologia, iconografia e storia della tradizione classica 4–5 (2001–2), pp. 260–73, 278–79, pl. 36b, identifies the subject as the conquest of Nova Carthago (Cartagena, Spain) by Scipio Africanus in 209 B.C.; locates this work below the allegorical figure of Experience and the other battle scene (65.183.3) under Immortality, the reverse of her earlier opinion [see Ref. 1998].
Filippo Pedrocco. Giambattista Tiepolo. Milan, 2002, pp. 45, 214–16, no. 61/9, ill.
Chiara Callegari inI colori della seduzione: Giambattista Tiepolo & Paolo Veronese. Ed. Linda Borean and William L. Barcham. Exh. cat., Castello. Udine, 2012, p. 152.
Caterina Furlan inI colori della seduzione: Giambattista Tiepolo & Paolo Veronese. Ed. Linda Borean and William L. Barcham. Exh. cat., Castello. Udine, 2012, p. 90.
Giuseppe Bergamini inGiambattista Tiepolo: "il miglior pittore di Venezia". Ed. Giuseppe Bergamini et al. Exh. cat., Villa Manin di Passariano. Codroipo, 2012, p. 38.
Denis Ton inGiambattista Tiepolo: "il miglior pittore di Venezia". Ed. Giuseppe Bergamini et al. Exh. cat., Villa Manin di Passariano. Codroipo, 2012, p. 221.
Andrea Tomezzoli inTiepolo in Milan: The Lost Frescoes of Palazzo Archinto. Exh. cat., Frick Collection. New York, 2019, pp. 69–71, 73, 76, 81 nn. 44, 47.
Fiocco (1931) first proposed the subject of this picture to be the capture of Carthage by Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus (later known as Scipio Africanus the Younger) in 146 B.C. This identification cannot be regarded as certain; others have been suggested (Zeri and Gardner 1973, Knox 1980, and Centanni 1998).
A drawing in the Graphische Sammlung, Staatsgalerie Stuttgart (inv. no. 1469) is related to the group at the right. A drawing in the Pierpont Morgan Library, New York (1997.57; formerly Rudolf J. Heinemann, New York) is related to the dead soldier in the foreground. Both are probably copies by Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo from about 1754–55. Domenico used these figures in his fresco in the church of Saints Faustino and Giovita, Brescia.
There is a drawing by Francesco Guardi in the Museo Horne, Florence (inv. no. 5633), after the group of soldiers in the center of the painting.
Two chalk drawings by Fragonard in the Norton Simon Museum of Art, Pasadena, depict studies after figures in this painting: one records the two soldiers on horseback at right and the other the dead soldier in the foreground (as well as studies after figures in The Triumph of Marius).
Curator Andrea Bayer surveys a selection of The Met's Venetian paintings ahead of a series of talks she will give in February, Celebrating La Serenissima.
Giovanni Battista Tiepolo (Italian, Venice 1696–1770 Madrid)
ca. 1743–50
Resources for Research
The Met's Libraries and Research Centers provide unparalleled resources for research and welcome an international community of students and scholars.
The Met Collection API is where all makers, creators, researchers, and dreamers can connect to the most up-to-date data and public domain images for The Met collection. Open Access data and public domain images are available for unrestricted commercial and noncommercial use without permission or fee.
Feedback
We continue to research and examine historical and cultural context for objects in The Met collection. If you have comments or questions about this object record, please complete and submit this form. The Museum looks forward to receiving your comments.
