Perspectives Art Explained

The Disrobing of Draupadi

Technical examination uncovers the creative process of a work attributed to the Indian painter Nainsukh.

May 17

Scroll down to view

This painting, dated around 1760–65, is attributed to the Indian painter Nainsukh, who was active in the small court of Guler at the hills of the Himalayas circa 1735–78.

Nainsukh remains one of the most influential artists of early modern Indian art and is admired for the originality and effectiveness of his compositions. Relatively few of the works created by the celebrated artist have been unequivocally ascribed to him, and an even smaller number contain a signature. Such is the case of the painting under study.

Little research has been conducted on the technical aspects of paintings attributed to Nainsukh. This line of study, however, has the potential to contribute significantly to the understanding of his creative process. Technical inquiries might also reveal aspects of his technique, placing his work within the broader context of the Pahari school of painting.

This folio, The Disrobing of Draupadi, is created over a sheet of wasli, a multilayered, handmade paper that has been prepared and polished to paint with opaque watercolors. It depicts an episode from the Hindu epic poem, the Mahabharata, a central moment in the struggle between two groups of cousins who compete for the throne of Hastinapur.

The episode precipitates the tragic war recounted in the poem: the Kurukshetra War, also known as the Mahabharata War. Draupadi, the central character of this painting, is married to the Pandava brothers, who have been tricked by their cousins, the Kauravas, into a rigged game of dice.

Persuaded by the Kauravas’ cunning invitation, the Pandavas bet all they have in the game—their wealth, their own freedom, and finally also their wife’s. When the game is over, they sit powerless and humiliated, crushed by the fact that they have lost everything in a reckless act of gambling.

Dushasana, drunk with power after outsmarting the Pandavas, attempts to strip Draupadi of her clothes (an event known as cheer-haran), but when she realizes that her husbands won't help her, she prays to Lord Krishna to spare her dignity.

A miracle takes place.

As her garments are taken away, more garments appear again and again, yards of fabric piling up at her feet.

The upper half of the composition is occupied by members of the Kaurava family, presided over by the blind king Dhritarashtra.

At the center-right of the arcade stands Duryodhana, the main conspirator, who has commanded his brother Dushasana to bring Draupadi into the court.

The characters in the painting are identified with small inscriptions in the local Takri script.

The lower half of the painting is defined by the distinctive design of a rug with vertical red and brown strips.

Scientific analysis of this area confirms a watercolor palette that is consistent with the traditions of the Pahari school of painting in the 18th century. Raman spectroscopy confirmed the use of vermillion to obtain a bright red orange that sets the ground, followed by slightly translucent strips of a dark maroon color obtained with hematite.

This bold yet elegant device is used by Nainsukh in other paintings from the same period.

TEST TEST TEST

Attributed to Nainsukh (Indian). The Poet Bihari Offers Homage to Radha and Krishna Opening page separated from a manuscript of the Satasai  Seven Hundred Versesca. 1760–65. Opaque watercolor, gold, and silver-colored paint on paper, Image: 7 3/8 × 10 3/4 inches (18.7 × 27.3 cm) Sheet: 9 3/4 × 12 7/8 inches (24.8 × 32.7 cm), Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, 125th Anniversary Acquisition. Alvin O. Bellak Collection, 2004 (2004-149-71)

Almost imperceptibly, at the center of the rug lie three very small white, oblong objects.

They are long dice, also known as tabular or stick dice. Although the white paint in some areas is lost, revealing the red color of the layer underneath, we can see that the black dots on the three dice sum a total value of five, perhaps a reference to the five Pandava brothers.

These three unassuming dice carry the tragic symbolism of the entire incident. They mark Draupadi’s fate, and much more than that, the unbearable humiliation that ultimately leads to the Mahabharata War.

A closer look at this center area offers an opportunity to investigate Nainsukh’s creative process.

Passages in the red and brown watercolor of the rug are eroded, partially revealing a form outlined in white and other colors that appear to have been brushed in before the painting was finalized, indicating late adjustments in the original composition.

Infrared reflected photography (IRP) is an imaging technique that captures certain materials at wavelengths that are not perceptible to the human eye and allows us to see through layers of paint.

IRP images of The Disrobing of Draupadi provide insight into how the artist made strategic changes in different phases of the creative process.

The most revelatory of the discoveries is the visualization of an outline in the shape of a cross positioned right above the dice. Because vermillion and hematite are pigments that can be relatively transparent to infrared radiation, we are able to see some elements that had been covered by these colors.

The undulating cross appears to be a game board, which sits on the floor together with triangular game pieces. All these elements are commonly part of the game known in India since the medieval period as pachisi. Other variants of the game with similar cloth boards are chaupar, and chausar.

Aside from the board, the revealed section includes four sets of pieces (a total of sixteen pieces)...

... and another set of three stick dice to the right of the board.

False color infrared (FCIR) is another imaging technique that combines IRP and visible images to produce false colors which are characteristic of certain colorants. This technique can be used to enhance the visualization of hidden elements.

Here, it highlights details of the game board that are not evident otherwise. Indigo will appear red in FCIR, and it is visible here outlining the inner grid of tiles that compose the board. Three tiles in each arm of the board are marked with an X. In pachisi these are called castles. The outer outline of the board was painted with a carbon-based black ink and appears black here.

Yellow background with dark red vertical stripes along with the back of man head holding a crown

Visible images, reflected infrared, and false color infrared images courtesy the Department of Paper Conservation, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

The FCIR image, as well as elemental analysis, confirmed that the pachisi game was not just included as a preliminary sketch but that it was fully painted in opaque watercolor of a variety of hues (including white, black, and indigo) and then covered with red and brown in the final phase.

An analytical technique known as micro-spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (micro-SORS) is capable of resolving stratigraphy by probing deeper into diffusely scattering materials than conventional Raman techniques.

This technique confirmed for instance that hematite is painted over vermillion in the stripes. Future studies will help us confirm the precise order in which each color was applied in this reworked area of composition.

In other known examples of folios depicting the same episode of the Mahabharata, like this one from the Fitzwilliam Museum’s collection, pachisi again appears to be the game to which the Pandava brothers lose their wife’s honor.

In this folio, attributed to a later period of the Guler workshop, we recognize the cloth board at the lower center.

Another painting in The Met collection features a pachisi game with a very similar board and pieces. Captured in mid-game with one of his courtiers, we see Maharaja Sovan Singh about to toss the three dice.

tk

Ambav (Indian, active 1860s). Maharaja Sovan Singh playing pachisi, ca. 1868. Opaque watercolor with gold on paper, inscribed in devanagari on the reverse, Image: 8 3/4 × 11 15/16 in. (22.3 × 30.3 cm) Sheet: 10 × 13 5/16 in. (25.4 × 33.9 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Cynthia Hazen Polsky and Leon B. Polsky Fund, 2019, (2019.123)

Chaupar is a game imbued with a higher social prestige than the very similar game of pachisi, which was more popular among lower strata of society. Below, we see Parvati pleading with her husband, Shiva, who has just cheated her out of a necklace with the dice game.

tk

Devidasa of Nurpur (active ca. 1680–ca. 1720). Shiva and Parvati Playing Chaupar: Folio from a Rasamanjari Series, dated 1694–95. Opaque watercolor, ink, silver, and gold on paper, Image: 6 1/2 x 10 7/8 in. (16.5 x 27.6 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gift of Dr. J. C. Burnett, 1957, (57.185.2)

Across regions and over centuries, pachisi and its variants came to be a recurrent symbol in stories of high stakes gambles and even betrayals.

Nainsukh’s choice to place the symbolic representation of Draupadi’s fate—and the great tragedy that is to unfold—on the three dice instead of the full game is remarkable in its subtlety.

Nainsukh’s effective simplicity, however, transcends his depiction of the game.

While in other renditions of the episode the emotional weight is diluted among many characters, including court officials and bystanders, in The Met’s painting, Nainsukh decides to include only the main players.

This is a detailed miniature painting depicting two main scenes separated by ornate columns. the upper half shows a royal gathering with men in vibrant robes sitting in a palace setting. the lower half illustrates a dramatic mythological scene with figures, some in combat and others observing.

The Disrobing of Draupadi, ca. 1800. India (Kangra, Punjab Hills). 206 mm x 283 mm. The Fitzwilliam Museum, Bequeathed 1946 by P.C. Manuk and Miss G.M. Coles, through the National Art Collections Fund (PD.102-1948). Note: late Guler School, c. 1820 (W.G. Archer, April 1951). 

The underdrawing revealed through IRP images sheds more light on this successful process of compositional simplification.

The IRP image reveals the presence of a figure who was removed in subsequent phases of refinement. The head of a man was roughly suggested at the left of Draupadi with swift brushstrokes in the initial arrangement.

Based on other examples, this may be one of the officials who helped Dushasana to forcibly escort Draupadi to the Kaurava court.

Other examples of strategic editing become evident in the IRP image.

At least two of the Pandava brothers were positioned at a higher level in the original sketch, and their crowns can be seen here, although faintly, right below the balcony line.

Their final position, clearly lower than the standing figures of Draupadi and Dushasana, emphasize the powerlessness of their situation.

Additional folds and accessories in Draupadi’s clothing appear in the underdrawing. These were eliminated in the final painting.

More clothes had also been included in the original composition, the pile extending into the lower central area.

These extra elements competed for the viewer’s attention, and the decision to remove them must have been motivated by the desire to simplify the scene and concentrate all the visual power on the small dice at the center of the rug.

This meticulous distillation and selection of expressive elements can be seen not only in the composition, but also in how details are rendered.

From the preliminary phases of creation to the adjustments and alterations, Nainsukh’s sense of elegance and poetic subtlety can be appreciated in the smallest details that conclude the work.

One example is his use of gold to depict Draupadi’s head scarf. Rather than using polished gold leaf, a technique that is often used by other Indian artists to create shimmery surfaces, the artist chose to employ a wash of muted shell gold applied masterfully by brush. Gold is used here almost as pure color, a device that is rare, surprising, and tremendously impactful.

The imperceptible layering of transparent washes of color…

The exquisite shading on Draupadi’s face…

Close up of a painting of a woman's face in side profile

The realistic precision of her jewelry…

The restriction in the patterns of embroidered textiles piled at her feet…

Every millimeter of this painting invites the viewer to pause and contemplate in unanticipated wonder.

The art historian and critic B. N. Goswarny eloquently explains one of the qualities that makes Nainsukh the exceptionally influential artist that he is—a quality that resonates vividly in The Disrobing of Draupadi.

“In his work there is understatement, a noble holding back which takes one completely by surprise and makes an image stay, languidly and long, in one’s awareness.”

Acknowledgments

Findings from Raman spectroscopy and micro-spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (micro-SORS) by Wunmi Akinlemibola, Research Assistant, Scientific Research, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, and Claudia Conti, Conservation Scientist, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milano (Italy)

Image Credits

Attributed to Nainsukh (active ca. 1735–78). The Disrobing of Draupadica. 1760–65. Opaque watercolor and gold on paper, Image: 9 11/16 × 13 7/16 in. (24.6 × 34.2 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Howard Hodgkin Collection, Purchase, Gift of Florence and Herbert Irving, by exchange, 2022, (2022.247) 

Attributed to Nainsukh (Indian). The Poet Bihari Offers Homage to Radha and Krishna Opening page separated from a manuscript of the Satasai Seven Hundred Versesca. 1760-1765. Opaque watercolor, gold, and silver-colored paint on paper, Image: 7 3/8 × 10 3/4 inches (18.7 × 27.3 cm) Sheet: 9 3/4 × 12 7/8 inches (24.8 × 32.7 cm), Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, 125th Anniversary Acquisition. Alvin O. Bellak Collection, 2004 (2004-149-71)

Visible images, reflected infrared, and false color infrared images courtesy the Department of Paper Conservation, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

The Disrobing of Draupadi, ca. 1800. India (Kangra, Punjab Hills). 206 mm x 283 mm. The Fitzwilliam Museum, Bequeathed 1946 by P.C. Manuk and Miss G.M. Coles, through the National Art Collections Fund (PD.102-1948). Note: late Guler School, c. 1820 (W.G. Archer, April 1951). 

Ambav (Indian, active 1860s). Maharaja Sovan Singh playing pachisi, ca. 1868. Opaque watercolor with gold on paper, inscribed in devanagari on the reverse, Image: 8 3/4 × 11 15/16 in. (22.3 × 30.3 cm) Sheet: 10 × 13 5/16 in. (25.4 × 33.9 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Cynthia Hazen Polsky and Leon B. Polsky Fund, 2019, (2019.123) 

Devidasa of Nurpur (active ca. 1680–ca. 1720). Shiva and Parvati Playing Chaupar: Folio from a Rasamanjari Series, dated 1694–95. Opaque watercolor, ink, silver, and gold on paper, Image: 6 1/2 x 10 7/8 in. (16.5 x 27.6 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gift of Dr. J. C. Burnett, 1957, (57.185.2)